"TrueFuel™ is the Answer"


About Us  --  TrueFuel Technology  --  Advantages of TrueFuel  --  Applications for TrueFuel  --  Buy Our Products and Services  --  Contact us


Basic Technical Information

Energy Overview

U.S. Energy

Global Warming

Hydrogen Economy

Dioxins & Furans

Natural Gas

Coal

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic Technical Information on TrueFuel

TECHNICAL REPORT 


US Energy Mix

 

Source

Percentage

 

 

Petroleum

39%

Coal

23%

Natural Gas

23%

Nuclear

8%

Renewables

7%

 

 

 

Renewable Energy 

Source

Percentage

Hydroelectric

50%

Biomass

43%

Geothermal

5%

Solar

1%

Wind

< 0.5%

 

 

 

1998 Energy use: 94.2 quadrillion BTUs -- 7 quadrillion renewable 


TrueFuelä

TrueFuel gas is a renewable fuel when its carbon comes from non-fossil sources

TrueFuel gas may be formed from raw and waste fossil and non-fossil carbon feedstocks to replace natural gas, coal, petroleum and other renewables

 

Supply Problems

World economies need quality medium-heat fuels

A medium-heat fuel is one that can be used in industry for process heat, in engines and for metal treatment

Price is increasing for all fossil fuels

Fossil fuel pollution is increasing

Predicted future: reliance on renewable hydrogen and carbon carrier medium-heat fuels

TrueFuel – A Significant Advance

 Process -- Gasifying carbon to form “TrueFuel” (a synthesis gas)

 The TrueFuel Process solves major limitations of R&D biomass gasifiers

          ° TrueFuel contains no tars

° TrueFuel is easily filtered as it flows from its production cell (T less than 100 degrees               centigrade; pressure near one atmosphere)

° TrueFuel does not need to be “scrubbed.” TrueFuel has low concentrations of carbon dioxide and nitrogen. Sulfur gases have not been detected. 

  •  TrueFuel is a high quality, medium-heat content fuel gas (approx. 300 BTUs)

  •  Produced with H2/CO ratio greater than one

  •  Has superior engine firing behavior compared to coal Syngas

  •  Immediate use as a fuel in engines

  •  Immediate compression in tanks

  •  Carbon feedstock is a worldwide commodity and cheap

  •  Carbon adjuncts may increase C1 and C2 hydrocarbon product content

  •  Dirty and salty water can be used

 

Properties of TrueFuel (preliminary)

 

Gas composition (by NASA)

Hydrogen 46%

Carbon monoxide 38%

Sum of C2H2, C2H2, CH4 1%

Sum of non-fuel gases 17% 

Average molecular weight

° Calculated (NASA analysis) 17.6

 

Heat content

° Calculated (NASA analysis) 308 BTU/Cu. Ft.

 

Performance of TrueFuel (preliminary)

Automobile Engine Emissions (by EPA)  

Compound

TrueFuel

Indolene

Ratio

 

 

 

 

HC

122 ppm

3,867 ppm

0.03

Nox  

404 ppm

404 ppm

1

CO

0.16%

3.06%

0.05

CO2

12.6%

9.3%

1.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 ppm  = Parts Per Million

  

Thermodynamics of TrueFuel

 

Thermodynamic Estimates

Chemical Reaction Heat                                                   BTU/lb-C

1. C + O2 = CO2                                                             14,000 (released)

2. C + H2O = H2 + CO                                                   4,700 (required)

3. H2 + CO = CO2 + H2                                              18,700 (released)

 Carbon burns by Rxn 1. TrueFuel is made and burned by Rxns 2 and 3.

The sum of Rxns 2 & 3 is the same as Rxn 1

The carrier products H2 + CO have a greater sum of heat combustion than C (i.e. they store added electrical power and release it in their combustion)

 (Rxn = Reaction)

 

Producer Energy/Input Electrical Energy

 Maximum ratio = 3 / 1

Simple thermodynamic estimates allow the possibility that the TrueFuel process will generate enough TrueFuel to sustain itself and provide surplus product

Caution: There are process energy losses and expenditures that will reduce the ratio.

A world-class testing laboratory will perform this evaluation

  

Feedstocks

Carbon Electrodes

Chemical Industry – carbon electrodes (non-local purchase)

Carbon waste adjuncts – sugars, glycols, phenols, etc. (local – charge fee)

 

Water (local)

 Fresh or salty water

Water from contaminated food processors, cloth dying, pharmaceutical manufacturing (fees assessed for the disposal of such water)

Electricity

Public utility (non-local; purchase during period of most favorable rates)

Non-utility (local; purchase low quality power)

 

Economics

Evaluations are being conducted using on-site fueling of engines and generators using TrueFuel

Goal -- Positive cash-flow sum for feedstocks

 

Safety of TrueFuel

Negative Features

TrueFuel contains 38% CO, which is toxic

 

Positives

When TrueFuel is released into the atmosphere, it rises and disperses

 TrueFuel is mostly a mixture of H2 and CO, but is not as explosive as pure H2

 TrueFuel is similar to “town gas” which was used in the United States until it was displaced by natural gas

 

Customer Profile

 Energy Deficient Zones

Need for low cost reliable fuel supply not tied to fossil fuels

Establishing biomass energy economics

 

Special Locations

California

New York

South America

Asia

Africa

Islands: Hawaii, Indonesia, Philippines

Example: Regions using similar fuel:

Hong Kong (Towngas corporation)

South Africa (Sasol)

 

 


This report was prepared by Dr. Jack Durham and Dr. Jerry Moore:

 

Dr. Jack Durham

 Dr. Durham is President of Durham Environmental, LLC, an environmental consulting firm. Dr. Durham was a staff chemist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for 17 years. Dr. Durham’s duties at the EPA included serving as the advisor to the Administrator on the pollution caused by the 789 oil wells set afire in Kuwait by Iraq. Dr. Durham has his Ph.D. in physical chemistry from the University of New Brunswick.

 Dr. Durham advised the EPA Administrator on the pollution caused by 789 oil wells set afire by Iraq in Kuwait. At the EPA, Dr. Durham managed many key projects, including the project on global climate change, getting fuel from forests, replacing all coal and petroleum use by growing and harvesting forest land. He also managed a project on generating power from charred wood from forest fires using turbines. For the EPA, Dr. Durham looked at every form of recyclable or green energy, including biomass and animal waste. Dr. Durham studied geothermal energy from lava and ocean thermal sources such as sequestered methane. He studied making energy from garbage, including recycling rubber tires. Dr. Durham managed the EPA’s oil shale project. He managed the coal conversion project, studying coal gasification, liquefaction, and in situ extraction.

 

Dr. Jerry Moore

 Dr. Moore is an environmental consultant to some 20 companies. Dr. Moore was a Charter Member of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) where he served from the EPA's founding until 1998. Dr. Moore chaired the Air Research Committee in the Office of Research and Development for the Office of Health and Environmental Assessment and was Co-Chair of the Water Research Committee. Dr. Moore also served on the Alternate Fuel Research Committee. Dr. Moore has his Ph. D. from HEED University and his Juris Doctor degree from LaSalle University.

 


To find out more and receive a press kit, contact:

 

John Lux

Advanced Energy Research Corporation

706 North Glenwood Avenue

Clearwater, FL 33755

 

Info@advancedenergyresearch.com

 

Phone: (727) 656-5504

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2003, 2006 Advanced Energy Research Corporation -- Site Map -- Search